In June 2012 a survey was conducted of Danville and Pittsylvania County citizens at the request of The Alliance for Progress in Southern Virginia. The purpose of the research was to better understand local attitudes toward uranium mining and issues surrounding uranium mining. The questions, which are shown below, are the exact questions answered by nearly 600 citizens. The size of the sample assures that the results of the research are statistically significant.
(The percentages listed do not equal 100%. In each question, “don’t know” or “no answer” responses are not included in the survey results for the purpose of clarity. In addition, these numbers are inclusive of those who feel strongly or somewhat strongly either way and are listed as one number. This was a telephone survey and the questions listed in this summary were asked in this exact order.)
Read more: Southern VA Citizens’ Views Regarding the Ban on Uranium Mining
Production agriculture and wood products are still the region’s number one industry, with an economic impact exceeding $200 million annually and that figure is growing. Global competition for ag commodities is fierce, and countries do not need much of an excuse to look elsewhere for product. One sick cow in Washington State shut down the US Beef export market for months a few years ago. With a native industry like farming on the rise, why take the risk of mining uranium in the area?
Even if the ban on uranium mining were lifted tomorrow, it would still be years before any uranium was actually removed from the ground. Why take the risk?
Economic uncertainty is usually the primary reason the stock market falls. Investors are wary in times of economic uncertainty. Businesses will not invest in themselves by expanding or relocating if there is uncertainty about the potential marketplace. With all of this very real uncertainty about the business efficacy of uranium mining, why should we take the risk?